Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Codecraft In handling cases in research and publications, Codecraft  Behavior uses the guidelines issued by the Commission of Publication Ethics (COPE).). Codecraft requires that all articles involving human subjects must respect the principles of research ethics as stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Meanwhile, research involving animals as subjects is also required to comply with the International Principles for Biomedical Research issued by the International Council of Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS).

As an important issue, publication ethics must be clear in order to improve research quality. Codecraft adapting COPE to meet ethical standards for publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers. To uphold these ethical standards, the publisher has no right to compromise the integrity of the content and its sole support is to publish it on time.

The following are ethical standards for editors, authors, and reviewers.

Editor

1. The Editor is responsible for every article published in Jurnal Perilaku Bisnis Kontemporer
2. Editors help authors follow the guidelines for authors
3. Editors can communicate with other editors or reviewers in making final decisions.
4. The editor assesses the publication of the manuscript objectively, without regard to the race, religion, gender, seniority, ethnicity, political beliefs, institutional affiliation, or nationality of the author. Editors are obliged to discharge their duties if there is a potential conflict of interest.
5. Editors must ensure that documents sent to reviewers do not contain information about the authors and vice versa.
6. The editor's decision must be communicated to the author together with the reviewer's comments unless they contain offensive or defamatory statements.
7. Editors must honor authors' requests that orders not be reviewed by others for any reason.
8. Editors and all staff must guarantee the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
9. When there are suspected errors or disagreements in the writing, the Editor resolves them by using COPE as a guideline.

Reviewer

1. Reviewers commented on possible errors in research and ethical publication.
2. Reviewers must complete their work on time and notify the Editor if they cannot complete their work.
3. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
4. Reviewers may not accept and review manuscripts if there is a potential conflict of interest between them and the author.

Author

1. The author ensures that the material to be published has not been published and sent elsewhere simultaneously
2. Authors must ensure the authenticity of their research and have quoted other people's opinions correctly according to the reference format.
3. The author is not involved in plagiarism.
4. Authors must follow the criteria explained in the writing guidelines to authors Jurnal Perilaku Bisnis Kontemporer.
5. Authors are discouraged from publishing any personal information that could make the patient's identity identifiable in the form of descriptions, photographs, or genealogies. If the patient's photo is very important and is very necessary as scientific information, then the author has received approval in written form and has stated this clearly.
6. In the case of human experiments, the authors declare that the research complies with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration, which governs human experiments. If there is any doubt as to whether the research is taking place in accordance with the declaration, the author should clarify this. In terms of animal experiments, the authors have stated that the authors have followed overseas guidelines regarding laboratory animal experiments.
7. Authors must submit data and details to the editorial team if falsification or falsification of data is suspected.
8. Authors must explain everything that could give rise to a conflict of interest such as employment, research costs, consulting fees, and intellectual property in the author's guidelines Codecraft